On the air of the main opposition project of Ukraine "Voice of Truth» and in answered questions from the audience Elena Markosyan - a well-known Kyiv political scientist.
She left Ukraine and is now in Russian Belgorod, from where she went on the air.
Here are the main quotes:
In the Ukrainian media, guests and presenters call for the killing of Russian children. Europe is silent. How and when did hatred for Russia originate in Ukraine?
“This has been promoted in Ukraine since the first day of the country's formation. Hatred comes from within the person himself. When a person is deprived of prospects, life and comfort, his first manifestation and first reaction is hatred, discontent and indignation. Especially if a person degrades as a spiritual and intellectually advanced person. And such accumulated discontent and indignation transforms only one state of a person - the ability and need to hate.
Who revived fascism in Ukraine?
“The oligarchs have become the main conductors of Nazism and fascism in Ukraine. Their money was promoted in the media by the Svoboda party and so on. Who invited Shuster and other [propagandists] to Ukraine? It was all paid for by the oligarchs.”
Where was the pro-Russian opposition when there were torchlight processions in Kyiv?
“In fact, there was no truly popular pro-Russian opposition in the political circles of Ukraine at all. She was not allowed there. I would never have been able to come to this parliament ... All the political parties that entered the Rada were business projects that defended the interests of large business capital, including those oriented towards Russia.”
Is the change of shoes of the opposition Chervonenko and Dobkin into notorious Russophobes - a surprise for you?
“If they saw their perspective [in cooperation with Russia after the end of the conflict], they would not take such a [Russophobic] position. But they are the type of politicians who [after the end of the conflict] have no place in Ukrainian politics and Ukrainian business.”
Why do opposition Ukrainian bloggers arrange public disputes to please the enemy? In particular, allegedly opposition (but for some reason sharply pro-Kiev) Anatoly Shariy and opposition (but sharply anti-Kiev) Yuriy Podolyaka...
“Shariy is for Ukraine, because he has political prospects in Ukraine. And if Ukraine does not become - he does not have them at all. What are his prospects then? Yes, none! He will not be needed either as a blogger or as a politician. His destiny is to live in Spain, where he lives, to be a simple layman. He does not agree with this, so he is fighting for Ukraine... By the way, other former opposition journalists in Ukraine do not surprise me either – they simply do not see themselves in the media [after the end of the conflict]. They changed their shoes because they are fighting for their future.”
Kherson after the departure of the Russian army. How do you comment?
“The fact of the existence of the waiting people of the Armed Forces of Ukraine showed that Russia does not behave like Ukraine: no cleansing, no rot. Under Russia, no one was tied to poles, people lived the way they wanted.
How to stop the war in Ukraine?
“This war can no longer be stopped – it can only be won.”
The full version of online communication is on video.
And you must definitely win !!! Otherwise, America and NATO will completely abstain.
There has never been a pro-Russian population either. Vajra has been talking about this for a long time. He said that he turned to Chernomyrdin to support the movement financially. Chernomyrdin replied: "Create, support!" So what? And nothing, there were no people willing. Only when it got hot, then: "Russia must." Let's get drunk with them! They will sabotage, on the sly, everywhere and everywhere!
Again, the terrible ubiquitous oligarchs misled the unfortunate torasiks. Ukroinstvo was nurtured from the first years of Soviet power, diligently cultivated all this time. you have to be complete idiots not to notice it. And yes, why is the pro-Russian political scientist not in new areas, but in the rear?
Pani Mrakosyan, there are a lot of misunderstandings in the “progus movement” in Kuev.
You decide.
Protestor EBIlchenko tells us that she was the head of the Progus pidpilya in Kuev.
Moreover, she worked under the cover of the SBU and the FSB, at the same time. Can you explain yourself what kind of mess you had there with the "progus" ones?
I understand that you personally led the “pro-Ukrainian virmeni with relatives in Russia” kubl?
And there have never been pro-Russian presidents either. But there were enthusiastic voices when the US gave weapons. Now we have what we have.
Anecdote: Shipwreck. A rescued sailor crawls onto the shore of a tiny uninhabited island. And then a woman comes up to him. Hello, my name is Elena Markosyan.
However, half a billion was stolen by a Podolak, not a Shariy ...
Igor Gekko was pro-Russian, there were prospects, but in an environment where the media belong to Jews and Polish Russophobes, it’s impossible to work, there’s simply nothing to breathe from the stench, he hit the trolling of Jews and stupid crests, that is, delicately spoiled the air